Jump to content

Talk:Crag martin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCrag martin has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starCrag martin is the main article in the Crag martins series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2010Good article nomineeListed
July 8, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Orphaned references in Ptyonoprogne

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ptyonoprogne's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "birdlife":

  • From Dusky Crag Martin: "Species factsheet Hirundo concolor". BirdLife International. Retrieved 4 April 2010
  • From Rock Martin: "Species factsheet Hirundo fuligula ". BirdLife International. Retrieved 11 April 2010
  • From Eurasian Crag Martin: "Species factsheet Hirundo rupestris". BirdLife International. Retrieved 26 March 2010

Reference named "turner160":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note for sentient editor - I'm working this up and all refs will be fixed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ptyonoprogne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ucucha 07:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why is the article not titled "Crag martin"? (Presumably because that is also a common name for P. rupestris?)
That's right, no big deal if you think it should be moved Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for animals, if the common name is unambiguous and well-established, we generally should use it as the article title. Since the common name here is not unambiguous, it's probably not a very good idea. I can see it go either way. Ucucha 06:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shouldn't the subfamily be in the taxobox?
We don't normally put in subfamilies for birds, although some other projects do Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The general rule is to use minor taxa like subfamily when they're directly above the taxon you're writing about (like subfamily when you're writing about a genus). No big problem if birds want to do it differently.
  • When was the genus first described? When were the species discovered? Also, the article on the Rock Martin actually has more information on the taxonomic status of the genus (saying that various other genera should be subsumed into Hirundo if this one is).
All added Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "In South Asia, migrant Eurasian birds sometimes join with flocks of the Dusky Crag Martin and roost communally on ledges of cliffs or buildings."—do they hybridize?
added in winter to make it clear it's outside the breeding season. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Predators and parasites" shouldn't be under "Behavior" (I think I said the same in the review for the Rock Martin; I now notice that the article on the Eurasian Crag Martin has the same problem).
Done, I'll check allthe article headings before I take this bunch to FT anyway. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No other problems, and most of those I mentioned may not even fall under the GA criteria. Ucucha 07:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added

Many thanks for reviewing, I promise next time I'll start with the parasites separate! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. There are two things above that I didn't strike, but the article meets the GA criteria, so I'm passing it now. Ucucha 06:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again, tell me there aren't any more rice rats to come???! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:33, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All in due time; extinct Malagasy mammals need articles too. Ucucha 15:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General

[edit]

Shouldn't the 'm' be capitalized? I.e., "Crag Martin"? Jrw1234 (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Crag martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crag_martin&oldid=1201215399"